Content in this website may be linked to, as long as the linking webpage
and passage has a known and clearly stated author.
|
|
|||
|
During the 2009 KY General Session, HB 67 was Submitted by Representative Henley for mandatory public reporting of Hospital or Health Care Acquired Infections and MRSA surveillance cultures. Background of MRSA and HAI (Adapted and updated from Preamble of SB 183):
|
Editorials Ky State Health Plan to Address Hospital Acquired Infections View Op-Ed Jul. 25, 2010 Stop Hospital Acquried Infections View Op-Ed July. 9, 2010 View CJ Editorial Commentory Op Ed Jul. 26, 2009 The Case for Surveillance of MRSA View Op-Ed Mar. 20, 2008 Mandatory Reporting of MRSA & HAI View Op-Ed Feb. 4, 2008 HWUSA- Policy Report Healthcare Acquired Infections - Jan. 21, 2008 Video Presentations Lisa McGiffert From Consumer Union Discusses Mandatory Pubic Reporting of Healthcare Acquired Infections View Video - Nov. 20, 2008 View Videos of Testimony Mar. 6, 2008 KY Senate Hearing |
||
|
"...also include the development and
promulgation of procedures and definitions that enable ICPs to
determine in a systematic and consistent way which have HAIs and
to measure their HAI rates overtime. In addition, CDC has
initiated and maintained data collection programs, such as NHSN,
that provide a mechanism that compare their experience with that
of other hospitals using the same set of clinical definitions
and data collection procedures. Why is Mandatory Reporting Needed? The Joint Commission's latest report shows only 113 sentinel events were voluntarily reported over a 13-year period (1995-2008). The Joint Commission. Sentinel Event Statistics - December 31, 2008. Retrieved January 1, 2009, From http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/Statistics/ In the 4.5 years of Connecticut’s voluntary, confidential adverse event reporting, hospitals have reported only 14 hospital-acquired infections. Connecticut Department of Public Health. (2008). Health Care Quality Reports, Adverse Events. Legislative Report To the General Assembly. Retrieved January 30, 2009, From http://www.ct.gov/dph/cwp/view.asp?a=3132&q=388090 US DHHS Action Plan: The US Dept of Health and Human Services has release a draft action plan to prevent healthcare-associated infections. http://www.hhs.gov/ophs/initiatives/hai/draft-hai-plan-01062009.pdf Several interesting statements are contained in this report: "Another approach CMS has adopted as it transforms the Medicare program from a passive payer towards the goal of being an active purchaser of higher quality, more efficient health care is hospital pay-for-reporting." "Public reporting enhances accountability in healthcare by increasing the transparency of quality data. Public reporting is designed to create both "indirect" financial and non-financial incentives to improve quality of care. Indirect financial incentives result when pubic reporting drives patients' choices and, therefore, market share. Non-financial incentives include publicizing performance, reputations, competition, motivation, accountability, and public, recognition." SHEA/APIC Position Statement: http://premierinc.com/quality-safety/tools-services/safety/topics/guidelines/downloads/01-shea-apic-07-pp.pdf "Although there is considerable evidence
supporting the use of active surveillance cultures as a
clinically effective and cost-effective method for combating the
spread of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms in specific
circumstances, to mandate as a SINGLE INFECTION CONTROL
INTERVENTION applied to all circumstances would preclude local
risk assessment and the implementation of a broad range of
interventions needed to control infections..." Cost Analysis of Mandatory Public Reporting of Health Care (Hospital) Acquired Infections and MRSA Surveillance Cultures: House Bill 67 has been submitted. This bill is very similar to the one submitted by Senator McGaha in 2008. The cost analysis seems to have stalled the bill. Cost estimates by the LRC from data provided from the Cabinet of Health and Human Services estimate the cost at $2,300,000 per year. This includes $300,000 for two epidemiologists and $100 per screening test for 20,000 tests on 10,000 Patients. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/09RS/HB67/fn.doc Health Watch USA feels these costs are
greatly overstated and that this bill should save Medicaid
significant funds for the following reasons: A). Senator Dick Roeding stated an MRSA test (culture) costs $10.00 per test. B). Dr Marty Evans, infectious disease medical director at the Lexington VA Hospital and a Kentucky Hospital Association witness, stated that the MRSA PCR test cost $30 per test. The PCR test gives results in hours and is the gold standard. (Types of Screening tests for MRSA http://www.questdiagnostics.com/brand/business/files/mrsa_pcr.pdf). C). Senator McGaha testified that “many hospitals” are already doing this and in these facilities there is no increase in cost. MRSA PCR tests could be used for unplanned hospital admissions and MRSA Culture for planned hospital admissions and discharges. Health Watch USA thus estimates the cost at $200,000 for personnel and $400,000 for testing. For a total of $600,000 per year. In addition, the increase in cost of a hospital acquired infections has been reported by the State of Oregon to be $32,000 per infection. Thus, the breakeven point is the prevention of approximately 20 of these infections per year. http://www.oregon.gov/OHPPR/RSCH/docs/HAI111406.pdf The increase in cost to commercial insurance in Pennsylvania for each Health Care Acquired Infection is over $52,000. http://www.allhealth.org/BriefingMaterials/HospitalacquiredinfectionsonPennsylvania-98.pdf |
|||